Intervention Review 3
Without doubt, the importance of the multisystemic therapy for risky groups of adolescents is worth examining accurately. Nowadays this issue remains rather controversial, since it deals with the actual problems of modern society. In the contemporary context, the proposed strategies that are to diminish deplorable consequences of behavioral disorders form a specific category related to medical procedures. That is why, the term “multisystemic therapy” requires particular attention. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the intervention program outlined in the article called “Multisystemic Therapy for Externalizing Youth,” underline the strongest and the weakest points of the presented solution, and clarify potential risks.
Specifically, the intervention is based on the community system and interpersonal relationships. As a rule, most young people who pertain to such category experience abuse or neglect in an ordinary life. It leads to the development of behavioral and mental health problems. In the course of a clinical procedure, their conduct becomes more violent, nervous or aggressive; and juvenile offenders are likely to express a negative attitude to social events. However, this program focuses on reciprocal reflection, which offers favorable opportunities for further amelioration. Its purpose is to remove barriers in the process of self-understanding and communication. Besides, this strategy is useful in the home-ased mode, involving a 4-6-month program of interaction (Zajac et al. 603).
By the way, the effectiveness of such treatment lies in the sphere of quality assurance. The intervention promotes the provision of the available support owing to on-call rotation at any time. Since the system involves intensive safety planning, it may be treated as a powerful tool that can show the best results (Zajac et al. 605). What is more, a high level of cooperation also ensures the accomplishment of all therapeutic goals. Indeed, the schedule of the selected program is strict, but it brings positive outcomes. A well-developed plan is based on the nine core principles, which are appropriate for the underlined project. Any participant has a chance to be acquainted with such approaches and broaden his or her knowledge in the aspect of personal interaction (Rowland et al. 403).
However, the intervention program may have some difficulties at the beginning stage of its functioning. The excessive conceptualization of behavioral problems can minimize the results of the whole investigation. In the context of the statistical approach, the empirical framework is worth being critically examined too. Conventionally, the reinforcement-based therapy may worsen the whole process of treatment since a radical intervention can influence patient’s well-being negatively in some cases (Pane et al. 86). That is why caregiver’s actions in monitoring the pprocess should be restricted due to established norms and embedded medical practices.
Moreover, the presented therapy may also deal with numerous groups of factors in the nearest future. For instance, additional tension and abuse are sure to have a tremendous impact on research. Besides, individual risks may form a distinctive category of serious clinical limitations and engender the appearance of negative tendencies (Zajac et al. 607). This possibility cannot be taken into consideration at the beginning stages of program’s functioning and will figure much later in the individualistic approach. Furthermore, family factors also play a pretentious role in the prescribed treatment. The peculiar atmosphere of a home-based model appears to be one of the significant characteristics that may affect the conducted intervention.
To conclude, it is essential to highlight that the multisystemic therapy for the externalizing youth is a perfect opportunity to spread awareness concerning such a peculiar sphere of medical interventions. All in all, the discussed material shows the vital actuality of the outlined problem and offers the implementation of effective strategies. Nevertheless, this program has both strong and weak points, forming a basis for the further dialog. That is why, the multisystemic therapy requires the following reflection to increase the comprehension of medical procedures and behavioral interventions.